HT: Mobile Fidelity at Scale PART I — FORESIGHT SNAPSHOT  |  HT: Mobile Fidelity at Scale  |  Fixed Time-Stamped Synthesis 2026 HT: Mobile Fidelity at Scale Card Type Historical Technology Shift Series Immersive Futures Guild — Vision 2035 Layer 1 — Atomic Foresight Object Status Active Confidence Medium Workshop Circle of Scholars — January 2026 Facilitator Circle of Scholars Workshop Team Tags mobile-XR  |  historical  |  accessibility  |  layer1  |  ht Tally.so Form https://tally.so/r/ilrn-if-ht-mobilefid-2026 Mobile devices have achieved sufficient processing, display quality, and sensor capability to support mid-fidelity augmented and mixed reality experiences at scale. This has extended the reach of immersive learning beyond dedicated hardware to devices that many learners already own, though with significant implications for the depth and type of immersive experience achievable. Key Drivers / Contributing Conditions: Smartphone GPU capability scaling ARKit, ARCore, and WebAR accessibility Mobile 5G and WiFi-6 connectivity improving streaming quality Tensions Carried Forward to Part II: Does mobile-accessible XR represent a meaningful equity advance or a qualitatively different experience that should not be counted as equivalent? Linked Scenarios / Strands: SC: Equity | SCENARIO: Pragmatic Normalization Ways of Knowing: Tree  ·  Garden  ·  Lantern PART II — COMMUNITY EVIDENCE & DIALOGUE TRACK  |  HT: Mobile Fidelity at Scale  |  H2 2026 — Living T COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION FORM  —  HT: Mobile Fidelity at Scale Submit case examples, methodological challenges, cultural perspectives, and proposed evidence criteria via: https://tally.so/r/ilrn-if-ht-mobilefid-2026 Part II — Scope and Instructions This section collects community responses, case examples, and challenges to the Part I foresight snapshot above. It opens July 1, 2026 and undergoes synthesis review in September 2026, November 2026, and January 2027. Contributions are submitted via the Tally.so form above and appear in the registers below after editorial review. The Part I text is not modified in response to Part II contributions; it is versioned at the Annual Handoff review. Contribution categories:  Case Example  |  Methodological Challenge  |  Cultural/Community Perspective  |  Proposed Evidence Criterion Ways of Knowing accepted:  Tree (evidence)  |  Garden (practice)  |  Lantern (futures) Tensions Open for Community Response: Does mobile-accessible XR represent a meaningful equity advance or a qualitatively different experience that should not be counted as equivalent? Contributor / Date Category Way of Knowing Contribution Summary [ Awaiting contributions — form opens July 1, 2026 ]