Table of Contents (Scientific Quality) 1. Overview & Vision Short framing statement: “What Scientific Quality means for iLRN” Reflection space for Dennis & Jule to articulate their vision Link to Knowledge Tree foundations (roots → trunk → branches as scholarly fields) 2. Peer Review Frameworks Current Conference Peer Review Process (criteria, reviewer guidelines) Rubrics in Development (A&E, Branch-specific adaptations) Future Considerations (double-blind review, open review, AI-assisted review) 3. Publication Standards SCOPUS Indexing Path (steps toward inclusion; key milestones) CORE Rankings Effort (how iLRN proceedings and journal outputs are positioned) Transparency & Reproducibility (open data, preregistration, code sharing) 4. Hallmarks of Scholarly Quality in Immersive Learning Methodological Rigor (learning sciences, HCI, design-based research, ethnographic studies) Game Design & User Experience (as professional/scholarly hallmarks of quality unique to iLRN’s identity) Learning Engagement & Outcomes (as key to successful immersive learning) Interdisciplinary Breadth (criteria for cross-field work that strengthens quality) 5. Living Rubrics & Measures Draft space for Dennis & Jule to upload/checklist evolving rubrics Links to Circle of Scholars discussions Placeholder for community feedback and version tracking 6. Partnership Alignment IEEE Technical Committee on Immersive Learning Environments (emerging standards, joint efforts) IBSTPI Competency Framework (instructional design crosswalks) How iLRN quality measures align with broader scholarly/professional organizations 7. Next Steps & Contributions Call for Dennis & Jule to add iLRN Scientific Quality work to date Placeholder: “First Positioning Statement Draft” (short essay ~500 words) Notes section for “Future Directions” (community input, open for volunteers)