iLRN Grant Prospect Fit Rubric
iLRN Grant Prospect Fit Rubric
edited November 15, 2026
Every prospect gets five scores from 0 to 2, for a total out of 10. Eligibility is a gate: a 0 there drops the prospect no matter what the other scores are.
Scoring criteria
|
Criterion |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Where to check |
|
Eligibility (gate) |
iLRN qualifies as the applicant, confirmed on the funder’s own page |
iLRN qualifies only with a named partner as lead, or eligibility is not yet confirmed |
iLRN’s organization type, location, or history is excluded |
Funder’s eligibility page or the call itself |
|
Mission fit |
Funder names standards, credentialing, learning technology, or open scholarly knowledge as a priority, and has funded similar work |
Priorities are adjacent, such as higher education or workforce in general, with no similar grant found |
Priorities do not touch education, research, or technology |
Program description and the last two years of grants |
|
Size fit |
Typical grants run $10,000 to $75,000, or a partner leads |
Typical grants run $75,000 to $150,000 |
Minimum grant is above $150,000, or the funder requires audited financials or a budget size iLRN does not have |
Grants database, Form 990-PF, call guidelines |
|
Access |
Open call or a published inquiry process anyone can use |
Inquiries accepted, but most grants are by invitation |
Invitation only, with no inquiry route |
“How to apply” page |
|
Timing |
Deadline or rolling review inside the next six months, with at least six weeks to prepare |
Next window is six to twelve months out, or under six weeks away |
No known window, or the program is paused or cancelled |
Call page and funder news |
Reading the total
|
Total |
Decision |
What happens next |
|
8 to 10 |
Go |
Moves to Stage 4. Inquiry drafted |
|
6 to 7 |
Conditional |
Goes ahead only if the weakest score has a named fix, such as a partner or a confirmation call |
|
5 or below, or Eligibility 0 |
Drop or park |
Record the reason and a date to look again |
Scoring rules
• Two volunteers score each prospect separately. A gap of 2 points or more on any criterion gets talked through before the go or no-go meeting.
• Every score cites a link. A score with no source is recorded as unverified and counted as 1 at most.
• Score what the funder’s own site says today, not what an aggregator or an old listing says.
• When scores tie, prefer the prospect where someone at iLRN already knows a person at the funder, then the one with the shorter application.
Worked examples
Three prospects from the starting list, scored on November 15, 2026.
|
Prospect |
Eligibility |
Mission |
Size |
Access |
Timing |
Total |
Decision |
|
Sloan Foundation, Technology program |
1 (unverified) |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
Conditional. Fix: confirm eligibility and focus areas on sloan.org |
|
M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
Conditional. Fix: confirm the next inquiry window and build the regional case |
|
Mellon Foundation, Higher Learning open call |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Gate |
Drop |
No comments to display
No comments to display