SC: Global Inequality
|
PART I — FORESIGHT SNAPSHOT | SC: Global Inequality | Fixed Time-Stamped Synthesis |
2026 SC: Global Inequality
|
Card Type |
Societal Challenge |
|
Series |
Immersive Futures Guild — Vision 2035 |
|
Layer |
1 — Atomic Foresight Object |
|
Status |
Active |
|
Confidence |
Medium |
|
Workshop |
Circle of Scholars — January 2026 |
|
Facilitator |
Circle of Scholars Workshop Team |
|
Tags |
global-inequality | geopolitics | access | layer1 | sc |
|
Tally.so Form |
https://tally.so/r/ilrn-if-sc-gi-2026 |
The geopolitical distribution of XR and AI research capacity, infrastructure investment, technology manufacturing, and platform governance is heavily concentrated in a small number of countries and regions. This creates structural inequalities in who shapes immersive learning futures — whose pedagogical traditions are encoded into global platforms, whose researchers can access cutting-edge tools, and whose communities bear the costs of extractive technology deployment without capturing equivalent benefits.
Key Drivers / Contributing Conditions:
-
Technology manufacturing concentration in a small number of economies
-
Research funding inequality across regions
-
English-language and Western epistemological dominance in XR content and research
-
Global South infrastructure deficits compounded by climate vulnerability
Educational and Design Implications:
-
iLRN Geographic Chapters as structural equity mechanism
-
Multilingual and multicultural Codex contribution as a governance requirement
-
Research partnership models that transfer capacity rather than extract data
Tensions Carried Forward to Part II:
-
How can a global foresight program avoid reproducing the inequalities it documents?
-
When do 'global standards' impose uniformity that erases legitimate local variation?
Linked Scenarios / Strands: See cross-links above
Ways of Knowing: Tree · Garden · Lantern
|
PART II — COMMUNITY EVIDENCE & DIALOGUE TRACK | SC: Global Inequality | H2 2026 — Living |
|
T |
COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION FORM — SC: Global Inequality Submit case examples, methodological challenges, cultural perspectives, and proposed evidence criteria via: https://tally.so/r/ilrn-if-sc-gi-2026 |
|
Part II — Scope and Instructions |
|
This section collects community responses, case examples, and challenges to the Part I foresight snapshot above. |
|
It opens July 1, 2026 and undergoes synthesis review in September 2026, November 2026, and January 2027. |
|
Contributions are submitted via the Tally.so form above and appear in the registers below after editorial review. |
|
The Part I text is not modified in response to Part II contributions; it is versioned at the Annual Handoff review. |
|
Contribution categories: Case Example | Methodological Challenge | Cultural/Community Perspective | Proposed Evidence Criterion |
|
Ways of Knowing accepted: Tree (evidence) | Garden (practice) | Lantern (futures) |
Tensions Open for Community Response:
-
How can a global foresight program avoid reproducing the inequalities it documents?
-
When do 'global standards' impose uniformity that erases legitimate local variation?
|
Contributor / Date |
Category |
Way of Knowing |
Contribution Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
|
[ Awaiting contributions — form opens July 1, 2026 ] |
No comments to display
No comments to display