Part I — iLRN2026 Virtual Campus operational, month-to-month planner
Codex Month-to-Month Planner
(January → July, oriented to June Online + Athens F2F)
January — Structural Grounding
Primary Function of Codex: Legibility & Trust
Key Questions
-
What is the Codex for in this conference cycle?
-
What content is authoritative vs exploratory?
-
What does a newcomer need to understand iLRN without prior context?
Benchmarks
-
“Start Here” shelf drafted and locked (read-only)
-
Codex governance norms stated (comments, edits, authority)
-
iLRN2026 book structure finalized (even if sparsely populated)
Risks to Watch
-
Overwriting legacy content without signaling change
-
Treating Codex as a website CMS
February — Role & Process Visibility
Primary Function: Transparency & Participation Readiness
Key Questions
-
Who owns what in practice?
-
Where are decisions made vs documented?
-
How can volunteers observe before acting?
Benchmarks
-
Role pages created:
-
Organizing Committee
-
Publications
-
Scientific Quality Assurance
-
Virtual Campus / Frames
-
-
Commenting enabled and norms reinforced
-
First “Working Draft” pages clearly labeled
Risks
-
Silent ownership
-
Informal decisions bypassing Codex documentation
March — Frame-by-Frame Development
Primary Function: Coordination Across Modalities
Key Questions
-
What does each Frame do for the Network?
-
What support roles are required per Frame?
-
What dependencies exist between Frames?
Benchmarks
-
One Codex page per Frame with:
-
Purpose
-
Owner
-
Accessibility lead
-
Volunteer needs
-
-
Knowledge Tree mapping visible
-
Early run-of-show skeleton drafted
Risks
-
Treating Frames as purely technical objects
-
Late discovery of accessibility gaps
April — Operationalization & Stress Testing
Primary Function: Reliability
Key Questions
-
Can someone new run this with the documentation alone?
-
Where are the single points of failure?
-
What breaks first under load?
Benchmarks
-
48-hour online event timeline drafted
-
Moderator and escalation protocols documented
-
Volunteer onboarding pages live
-
“Draft → Active” status transitions applied
Risks
-
Overconfidence in tacit knowledge
-
Documentation lagging behind decisions
May — Lockdown & Rehearsal
Primary Function: Execution Readiness
Key Questions
-
What is now fixed?
-
What is still adaptable?
-
What must not change during June?
Benchmarks
-
Core execution pages locked
-
Only designated roles allowed to edit operational pages
-
Codex used in at least one rehearsal or dry run
-
Clear links from Frames → Codex references
Risks
-
Last-minute structural changes
-
“Just this once” exceptions undermining clarity
June — Live Use (Online + Athens)
Primary Function: Reference & Continuity
Online (June 14–15)
Key Questions
-
Can participants quickly orient mid-flow?
-
Are moderators supported in real time?
-
Is documentation being updated responsibly?
Benchmarks
-
Codex referenced live, not edited impulsively
-
Incident notes logged for post-event synthesis
-
Clear boundary between operational notes and reflections
Athens (Late June)
Key Questions
-
What requires in-person synthesis?
-
What decisions need durable documentation?
-
What patterns are emerging?
Benchmarks
-
Dedicated Athens synthesis pages
-
Governance or strategy changes recorded
-
Explicit handoff to post-conference phase
July — Consolidation & Memory
Primary Function: Institutional Learning
Key Questions
-
What worked structurally?
-
What should never be repeated?
-
What patterns now belong in the Codex permanently?
Benchmarks
-
Post-event synthesis completed
-
Pattern candidates identified and refined
-
iLRN2026 book archived with intent (not frozen chaos)
Risks
-
Treating Codex as an archive rather than a living system
-
Losing volunteer insight once urgency fades
If useful, next steps could include:
-
A single-page “Who touches the Codex when?” cheat sheet
-
A Codex page status taxonomy (Draft / Active / Locked / Archived)
-
A failure-mode map (“If X goes down, consult Y page”)
Each would further reduce cognitive load during June.
No comments to display
No comments to display